GROUP A - SCORE 76.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 90 | Carlos Castaneda  63

 Critique of the Photo by ChatGPT:

Impact:

The image evokes a dreamlike, minimalist atmosphere. The high-key style creates a sense of lightness and delicacy, emphasizing the "ethereal" quality. While this approach aligns with the title and theme, the extreme brightness may reduce the overall impact for some viewers by obscuring details.

Presentation:

The presentation is clean and soft, but the extreme high-key effect pushes the highlights into overexposure in some areas, losing texture in the background and the plant. The ladybug stands out nicely due to its darker tones, creating a focal point, but the surrounding elements feel overly washed out.

Exposure:

The exposure is intentionally high-key, but it verges on overexposure in parts of the background and the white highlights. This choice works for an ethereal look, but dialing back slightly could help retain more detail and add subtle depth.

Composition:

The subject placement is effective, with the ladybug positioned off-center, creating visual interest. The lines of the stems draw the viewer's eye naturally to the focal point. However, the overall composition feels slightly unbalanced due to the lack of tonal variation in the rest of the frame.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus on the ladybug is sharp, which is critical for the success of this image.
• The high-key processing obscures finer details in the plant and background, which could be a deliberate stylistic choice but might not appeal to all viewers.
• The tonal range feels limited, leaning heavily toward bright whites.

Distractions:

The simplicity of the background enhances the ethereal feel, but the overexposed highlights can be slightly distracting. Adding a touch more contrast or shadow detail could create a more grounded and visually balanced image.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong concept but slightly reduced due to overexposure (+3 points deduction).
• Presentation: Clean but verging on excessive high-key effect (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: High-key style works, but slight adjustments are needed to retain detail (+3 points deduction).
• Composition: Well-placed subject, though overall balance could be improved (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, though overexposure limits tonal depth (+2 points deduction).

Final Score: 87 (Good - Above average image, but could be improved)

This image has a compelling and artistic concept but would benefit from refining the high-key effect to preserve more detail and tonal variety. This would elevate it toward an excellent or superior category.

JUDGES: Richard Waas 89 | Carlos Castaneda  63

This was shot at a campfire. The subject is my son. He was playing his guitar. Years ago I entered similar images but this one has never been entered.

Critique of the Photo by ChatGPT:

Impact:

The image successfully conveys an intimate, storytelling mood. The use of light and shadow is evocative, suggesting a quiet moment of reflection. The cowboy theme, combined with the chiaroscuro lighting, creates a strong emotional pull. The expression and the visible guitar reinforce the narrative element.

Presentation:

The subject is well-presented, with dramatic lighting accentuating facial features and textures, particularly in the cowboy hat. However, the composition feels slightly imbalanced. The dark negative space on the right is too dominant and could be cropped for a tighter, more focused frame.

Exposure:

The exposure is challenging due to the low-light scenario, but it is managed effectively. The highlights in the face and the reflection in the eyes are sharp and compelling. Some details are lost in the shadows, particularly in the lower part of the image, but this is consistent with the mood.

Composition:

The side lighting draws attention to the cowboy's face and the guitar, creating an engaging narrative. However, the placement of the subject could be improved. Cropping some of the negative space on the right and slightly lowering the focus on the guitar would better balance the composition.

Technical Flaws:

• Focus on the face is sharp and clean.
• There is a lack of detail in the darker areas, which might be intentional but could be refined to add subtle textures.
• No noise or artifacts are visible, which is commendable for a low-light image.

Distractions:

There are no significant distractions in the image. The dark background keeps the focus entirely on the subject. However, the bottom right corner, where the guitar meets the frame, is slightly abrupt and could use more context or a softer transition.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong emotional and storytelling pull, minor adjustments for balance (+2 points deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though cropping could enhance the focus (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Well-handled, though slightly more shadow detail could improve depth (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Effective but could benefit from tighter framing (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with slight refinement needed in shadow areas (+1 point deduction).

Final Score: 91 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This image is strong in narrative and emotional impact. With slight adjustments to composition and shadow detail, it could push toward the superior category.

GROUP A - SCORE 72.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 82 | Carlos Castaneda  63

Taken in my dining room at 6pm. Nikon D3400. 1/60 sec at f/5.0 ISO 400; 24mm.

Critique of the Photo by ChatGPT

Impact:

This image conveys a strong sense of simplicity and elegance. The interplay of light and shadow is the centerpiece, creating visual intrigue. The soft shadows of the candle holders against the wall add depth and dimension, while the horizontal window patterns contribute an additional layer of geometric interest.

Presentation:

The presentation is excellent, with a minimalist and balanced approach. The tonal range emphasizes the metallic texture of the candle holders, while the shadows are crisp and well-defined. However, the lower right corner feels slightly heavy due to the darker tones, which could be lightened to balance the image more effectively.

Exposure:

The exposure is well-managed, with highlights and shadows balanced to create a pleasing contrast. The reflective surfaces of the candle holders are rendered beautifully, showing fine detail without overexposing the lighter areas. The shadows maintain depth without appearing overly harsh.

Composition:

The composition is strong and thoughtfully executed. The placement of the candle holders creates symmetry and stability, while the diagonal shadows and horizontal window lines add visual dynamism. The decision to include part of the table creates a grounding element but might be slightly cropped for a cleaner presentation.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp, capturing fine details in both the candle holders and the textures of the wall and table.
• There are no visible artifacts or noise.
• The image has no significant technical flaws but could benefit from slightly softening the darker tones in the bottom right for better balance.

Distractions:

There are minimal distractions. The simplicity of the scene allows the viewer to focus entirely on the candle holders and their shadows. The window shadows complement the main subject well, enhancing rather than detracting.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong and visually elegant, with minor room for increased emotional engagement (+1 point deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though slight tonal adjustments could enhance balance (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Well-handled, with only subtle improvements needed (+1 point deduction).
• Composition: Strong and stable, but cropping might slightly refine the frame (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with no major issues (+1 point deduction).

Final Score: 94 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This is a refined and visually pleasing photograph that works perfectly in the monochrome theme. Minor tonal and compositional adjustments could elevate it to the superior category.

GROUP A - SCORE 73.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 79 | Carlos Castaneda  68

This photograph was taken near Flamingo at Everglades National Park on June 30, 20224

Critique of the Photo by ChatGPT:

Impact:

This image creates a strong emotional and environmental impact by presenting a stark and haunting scene of dead mangrove trees. The skeletal forms of the trees against the expansive sky evoke a sense of desolation and loss, aligning well with the monochrome theme to emphasize mood and texture.

Presentation:

The black-and-white treatment is effective in highlighting the texture of the dead trees and the clouds above. The tonal contrast between the foreground and sky creates depth, but the mid-tones in the trees could be enhanced slightly to improve detail and separation from the background.

Exposure:

The exposure is well-balanced, with no significant clipping in the highlights or shadows. However, the sky dominates the frame and could benefit from slight darkening or increased contrast to enhance its dramatic appearance. The foreground is adequately lit but could use subtle adjustments to bring out more detail in the underbrush.

Composition:

The composition is strong, with the trees framed in a way that conveys chaos and disorder. The diagonal lines and varying heights of the branches create visual interest, and the layering of the trees adds depth. The sky occupies a significant portion of the frame, which complements the scene but might be slightly reduced for a more balanced composition.

Technical Flaws:

• The image is sharp and well-focused, with good detail in the branches and clouds.
• There is no visible noise or artifacts.
• The lack of tonal variation in some areas of the foreground could detract from the overall richness of the image.

Distractions:

There are no significant distractions in the image. The chaotic arrangement of the trees and the moody sky work cohesively to maintain the viewer's attention. The only potential improvement could be refining the tonal balance to emphasize key elements.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong and evocative, conveying a powerful environmental message (+1 point deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though slight tonal refinements could enhance it (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Well-handled, but minor adjustments to sky and foreground detail could improve depth (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Effective, though slightly adjusting the sky's dominance might balance it further (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with only tonal depth improvements needed (+1 point deduction).

Final Score: 92 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This is a compelling and thought-provoking photograph that aligns beautifully with the monochrome theme. Minor refinements to tonal balance and composition could elevate it to the superior category.

 GROUP A - SCORE 91

JUDGES: Richard Waas 93 | Carlos Castaneda  89

Critique of the Photo Titled by ChatGPT:

Impact:

The image of the full moon is captivating and timeless, leveraging the high-contrast black-and-white presentation to highlight the craters and textures of the lunar surface. However, the simplicity of the composition limits the emotional or narrative depth, relying solely on the subject's intrinsic beauty.

Presentation:

The moon is well-centered, creating a strong focal point against the stark black background. While the minimalism is effective, additional elements—such as a slight crop or inclusion of subtle foreground interest—could enhance the visual appeal and storytelling.

Exposure:

The exposure is well-handled, preserving fine details on the moon's surface without overexposing the highlights. The black background is pure and free from distractions, ensuring the moon remains the sole focus.

Composition:

The composition is minimalistic, with the moon isolated in the frame. While this emphasizes the subject, the large amount of negative space at the bottom feels excessive and could be cropped to create a more balanced composition.

Technical Flaws:

• The moon's surface is sharp, capturing excellent detail in its craters and textures.
• There is no visible noise in the dark background, which enhances the overall quality.
• No technical flaws are evident, but the composition could be more dynamic.

Distractions:

The image is distraction-free due to the clean black background. However, this minimalism might feel too empty for some viewers, as there are no additional elements to add context or interest.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong but limited by simplicity and lack of narrative depth (+2 points deduction).
• Presentation: Clean and minimalistic, though a slight crop could improve balance (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Excellent, with all details preserved effectively (+0 points deduction).
• Composition: Minimalist but could be more engaging with cropping or added elements (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: None, but the emptiness might detract for some (+1 point deduction).

Final Score: 93 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This is a technically solid and visually appealing photograph. With slight adjustments to composition, it could elevate the visual interest and achieve a superior score.

GROUP B - SCORE 66.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 80 | Carlos Castaneda  53

I Took This Picture Early In The Morning, F 16 ISO 3200

 Critique of the Photo by ChatGPT

Impact:

The photograph captures the architectural beauty of a striking building with clean lines and geometric shapes. The interplay of light and shadow adds depth and visual interest, creating a strong graphic quality. However, the image lacks an emotional or dramatic element that could make it more engaging for viewers.

Presentation:

The use of black and white enhances the architectural details, emphasizing contrasts and shapes. The shadows cast by the building create dynamic patterns, which contribute to the overall composition. The foreground elements, such as the street and signage, feel slightly distracting and could be minimized with cropping.

Exposure:

The exposure is generally well-balanced, with the highlights and shadows enhancing the contrast in the building's structure. However, some shadow areas appear too dark, obscuring details that could enrich the image. A slight adjustment to lift the shadows would improve tonal depth.

Composition:

The composition is solid, with the building positioned prominently and the eye drawn to its ascending shapes. The horizontal elements in the foreground add some grounding, but the empty street and signage feel slightly out of place compared to the elegance of the building. Cropping the lower portion of the frame could improve focus on the main subject.

Technical Flaws:

• The image is sharp, with good detail in the architectural elements.
• The tonal range is good, but slightly underexposed shadows detract from the finer details.
• No visible noise or artifacts are present, maintaining a clean and polished look.

Distractions:

The street-level elements, including the signage and pole, are slightly distracting. These do not detract heavily but do compete with the subject's clean lines and geometric harmony.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong architectural focus but limited emotional or dramatic engagement (+2 points deduction).
• Presentation: Clean and well-framed, though minor adjustments could enhance focus on the subject (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Good but slightly heavy shadows reduce detail (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Strong, though cropping the foreground could improve the balance (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, though some elements compete for attention (+1 point deduction).

Final Score: 92 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This image effectively highlights the beauty of the building’s architecture. With subtle adjustments to the shadows and composition, it could elevate further into the superior category.

GROUP A - SCORE 68

JUDGES: Richard Waas 73 | Carlos Castaneda  63

The backyard of my son's house in Lafayette, CO, on the one snowy day of this November. Taken with a samsung cell phone camera.

Critique of the Photo Titled by ChatGPT

Impact:

This image captures the serene and peaceful beauty of a snowfall, evoking a strong sense of calm and nostalgia. The snow-laden furniture and trees add texture and depth, while the falling snow contributes to the atmosphere. The scene is relatable and emotionally engaging, especially for those familiar with winter settings.

Presentation:

The image is well-framed, with a strong sense of balance between the foreground (table and chair) and background (trees and snow-covered surroundings). The monochrome treatment works well to highlight the textures and contrast of the snow. However, the umbrella in the foreground feels slightly dominant and competes with the chair and table for attention.

Exposure:

The exposure is generally well-handled, with the whites of the snow bright but not blown out. The details in the darker elements, such as the fence and tree trunks, are well-preserved. However, the overall tonal range could be expanded slightly to make the mid-tones more pronounced and create additional depth.

Composition:

The composition is thoughtful, with the table and chair anchoring the image and the lines of the fence and trees providing a natural framework. The layered depth, with the background trees softly receding into the snowfall, is pleasing. Slightly adjusting the placement of the table and chair to avoid the umbrella dominating the foreground might improve balance.

Technical Flaws:

• The image is sharp, with clear details in both the foreground and background elements.
• There is no noticeable noise or artifacts, even in the subtle gradients of the snow-filled sky.
• No significant technical flaws are evident, but some tonal adjustments could enhance the overall richness.

Distractions:

The umbrella in the foreground is the main distraction, as it draws attention away from the other elements in the frame. While it adds context to the snowy scene, its prominence could be reduced by cropping or repositioning the frame.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong, with an emotional resonance tied to the beauty of winter (+1 point deduction).
• Presentation: Clean and well-balanced, though minor refinements could improve foreground focus (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Well-handled, but slight tonal expansion could add depth (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Strong, though the umbrella slightly detracts from the balance (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with the umbrella being the main issue (+1 point deduction).

Final Score: 93 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This image beautifully captures the mood of a snowfall. With minor adjustments to composition and tonal range, it could become an even more engaging and polished entry.

Original Score: 93
Revised Critique:

• Impact: The peaceful snowfall scene is charming but lacks a unique element to stand out in a competition.
• Presentation: The umbrella, while contextual, competes too much with the table and chair for attention.
• Exposure: The snow-covered details are well-managed, but tonal adjustments to emphasize the mid-tones could make the image more engaging.

Revised Score: 90

GROUP A - SCORE 74.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 89 | Carlos Castaneda  63

 Critique of the Photo Titled "Lights On" Submitted to the Monochrome Competition

Impact:

This image makes an immediate impression with its clean geometric design and symmetry. The interplay of light and shadow, combined with the futuristic and abstract feel of the chandeliers, gives the photograph a modern and striking aesthetic. It effectively uses monochrome to emphasize contrast and create a visually compelling scene.

Presentation:

The chandeliers are well-presented, with sharp details and a clear emphasis on their circular symmetry. The reflection of the second chandelier in the glossy surface below adds depth and interest, though it feels slightly less defined than the primary chandelier. The background patterns of the ceiling enhance the abstract composition without overwhelming the subject.

Exposure:

The exposure is handled well, with the highlights on the light bulbs bright but not overexposed. The shadows in the background are rich and deep, ensuring the focus remains on the chandeliers. However, the reflective surfaces in the lower portion could use slight brightening to enhance the visibility of the second chandelier.

Composition:

The composition is strong, with the primary chandelier positioned prominently and its circular shape complemented by the repeating patterns in the background. The inclusion of the second chandelier's reflection adds another layer of complexity. A slight crop to remove excess negative space at the top could make the composition even tighter and more dynamic.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp, capturing fine details in the chandeliers and reflections.
• The tonal range is effective, though slightly more contrast in the reflective area would bring out additional detail.
• No significant technical flaws are evident.

Distractions:

There are minimal distractions in the image. The repetitive patterns in the ceiling contribute to the abstract nature of the photograph rather than detracting from it. The lower chandelier reflection, while a strong element, could be slightly more defined for better balance.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong, with a bold and modern aesthetic (+1 point deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though refining the reflection area could enhance it further (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Well-handled, but slight adjustments to contrast could improve the reflective details (+1 point deduction).
• Composition: Strong, though cropping for tighter focus might improve balance (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with no major issues affecting the overall impact (+1 point deduction).

Final Score: 94 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This is a visually striking and modern photograph that effectively uses monochrome to enhance its abstract design. With minor adjustments to the reflection and composition, it could elevate to the superior category.

Original Score: 94
Revised Critique:

• Impact: Visually striking but leans more on abstract design than emotional or storytelling resonance.
• Presentation: The lower chandelier's reflection is underutilized, reducing the depth that it could contribute.
• Composition: The top portion feels too empty, and a tighter crop would improve balance.

Revised Score: 89

 Flame from a fireplace. But, Let's Go Heat!
ISO 400
Exposure f 2.5 at 1/5000
lens set at 50mm

Critique of the Photo by ChatGPT:

Impact:

This image captures the dynamic and fluid nature of fire in a striking way. The use of monochrome enhances the abstract qualities of the flames, turning them into swirling, sculptural forms. The high contrast between the bright flames and the dark background creates drama and intensity, evoking both warmth and movement.

Presentation:

The presentation is clean and minimalistic, with the flames as the sole subject. The sharp details in the flames' edges and the smooth gradation within them add depth and texture. The inclusion of the log at the bottom anchors the composition, providing context, though it could be slightly more subdued to keep the focus on the flames.

Exposure:

The exposure is well-handled, with the flames glowing brightly without losing detail in the highlights. The shadows are deep and rich, creating a stark contrast that emphasizes the flames' shape. However, some minor adjustments to balance the mid-tones could enhance the gradients within the flames.

Composition:

The composition is effective, with the flames flowing naturally through the frame. The sweeping curves and patterns lead the eye fluidly, creating a sense of movement. The log at the bottom provides a base for the flames but feels slightly dominant and could be cropped or darkened to better isolate the flames.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp, capturing intricate details in the flames and the texture of the log.
• There is no visible noise or artifacts in the dark background, maintaining a clean and polished look.
• The tonal balance is strong, though slight refinement in the mid-tones could enhance the texture.

Distractions:

The image is minimalistic, with no significant distractions. The log at the base could be less pronounced to fully emphasize the abstract quality of the flames.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong and visually captivating, evoking a sense of movement and energy (+1 point deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though slight adjustments to isolate the flames more could help (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Well-handled, with only minor refinements needed in mid-tones (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Strong, though the log could be less prominent to enhance abstraction (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with only minor issues affecting focus on the flames (+1 point deduction).

Final Score: 93 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This is a visually engaging and dramatic image that showcases the fluidity of fire in a unique way. With slight adjustments to composition and tonal balance, it could reach the superior category.

GROUP A - SCORE 73

JUDGES: Richard Waas 73 | Carlos Castaneda 73

ISO 640, 24-105 mm @ 105 mm; f 4.5; 1/100 s Hand Held

Original GPT Score: 95
Revised Critique:

• Impact: The subject is elegant but doesn’t evoke strong emotional or storytelling elements, limiting its competitive edge.
• Composition: The shadow interplay is intriguing but lacks a dynamic focal point beyond the lamp itself.
• Technical Flaws: The upper-right shadow is more visually dominant than initially noted.

Revised Score: 89

GROUP A - SCORE 83

JUDGES: Richard Waas 88 | Carlos Castaneda  78

Fujifilm X-HDS 16-80mm lens @ 41mm. ISO 160 | f/5.6 | 1/4 sec on a Tripod and a ND filter.

Location: Fairchild's Rain Forest area.

 Critique of the Photo by CharGPT:

Impact:

This image has a striking and serene impact, capturing the fluidity and texture of water in a natural setting. The long exposure technique creates a soft, silky effect on the water, adding to the dreamlike quality of the scene. The monochrome treatment emphasizes the texture and contrast between the flowing water and the rugged rocks.

Presentation:

The presentation is elegant, with a balanced composition that draws the viewer’s eye through the frame, following the cascading water. The inclusion of surrounding foliage adds context and enhances the composition, but the leaves near the center feel slightly intrusive, breaking the otherwise seamless flow of the water.

Exposure:

The exposure is well-handled, particularly in the water, where the highlights are not blown out, and the shadows retain detail. However, some areas of the surrounding rocks and foliage feel slightly underexposed, which could be brightened to bring out more detail and depth.

Composition:

The composition is strong, with the cascade acting as a natural leading line that guides the viewer’s eye from top to bottom. The placement of the rocks and foliage creates a layered effect that adds depth. However, the central branch and leaves partially obscure the water, which slightly detracts from the overall fluidity of the image.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp where it needs to be, particularly on the rocks and water.
• There is no visible noise or artifacts, which is commendable given the high-contrast scene.
• The tonal range is strong, but slight adjustments to the mid-tones in the foliage could enhance detail.

Distractions:

The primary distraction is the branch and leaves near the center, which interrupt the smooth lines of the water. Otherwise, the image is clean and free from unnecessary elements that might detract from the scene.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong, with a serene and captivating effect (+1 point deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though slight refinement in detail and cropping could enhance focus (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Well-handled, but subtle brightening in underexposed areas could improve depth (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Strong but slightly disrupted by the central foliage (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with only minor issues affecting flow (+1 point deduction).

Final Score: 91 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This is a beautiful and calming image that works exceptionally well in monochrome. With minor adjustments to the composition and tonal balance, it could reach the superior category.

 GROUP A - SCORE 78

JUDGES: Richard Waas 93 | Carlos Castaneda  63

Critique of the Photo by ChatGPT:

Impact:

This image has a strong and dramatic impact, showcasing the elegance and intricacy of the "Night Blooming Cereus" flower. The use of monochrome emphasizes the texture and form of the petals, while the dark background isolates the subject and adds to the overall sense of mystery and beauty.

Presentation:

The flower is beautifully lit, with the highlights and shadows accentuating the petals' structure. The symmetrical nature of the flower is compelling, drawing the viewer's attention to the center. The black background creates a stark contrast that enhances the flower's luminous quality.

Exposure:

The exposure is expertly handled, with the highlights on the petals glowing without being overexposed. The shadows add depth and dimension, while the darker tones of the background keep the focus firmly on the subject. The details in the flower's center are also well-preserved, providing texture and interest.

Composition:

The composition is strong, with the flower centered and slightly angled, creating a dynamic yet balanced image. The surrounding petals frame the center beautifully, leading the viewer's eye inward. The inclusion of a hint of the flower's stem below adds a subtle grounding element without detracting from the main focus.

Technical Flaws:

• The image is sharp, with fine detail captured in the petals and the flower's center.
• There are no visible artifacts or noise, which is especially commendable given the dark background.
• The tonal balance is excellent, with a full range of blacks, grays, and whites.

Distractions:

There are no significant distractions in this image. The clean and minimalist approach ensures that all attention is drawn to the flower.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong and captivating, with a sense of drama and elegance (+1 point deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, with no major improvements needed (+0 points deduction).
• Exposure: Flawless, with no loss of detail in highlights or shadows (+0 points deduction).
• Composition: Strong and balanced, perfectly emphasizing the subject (+0 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: None, as the image is clean and polished (+0 points deduction).

Final Score: 99 (Superior - A near-perfect image)

This is a stunning and meticulously crafted photograph that perfectly captures the beauty of the "Night Blooming Cereus." Its strong impact, flawless execution, and artistic presentation make it a standout in any monochrome competition.

Original Score: 99
Revised Critique:

• Impact: The flower's elegance and lighting are captivating, but the image could benefit from additional compositional experimentation, such as a tighter crop or more dynamic angle.
• Presentation: While minimalistic, the black background might feel too stark to some viewers, lacking subtle texture for context.

Revised Score: 94

GROUP B - SCORE 71

JUDGES: Richard Waas 79 | Carlos Castaneda  63

Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

The photo juxtaposes historical and modern architecture, effectively capturing the theme of "past meets present." The contrast between the colonial-style building, the church tower, and the modern high-rise evokes a sense of cultural continuity and evolution. However, the emotional impact is moderate, as the scene feels more documentary than evocative or dramatic.

Presentation:

The architectural elements are well-rendered, and the monochrome treatment enhances the textures and details of the buildings. The tonal range, however, feels somewhat limited, particularly in the shadows, where some details are lost. The bright sky dominates the upper portion of the image and could benefit from more contrast to balance the composition.

Exposure:

The exposure is generally adequate, with details preserved in the mid-tones. However, the darker areas, such as the shadowed sections of the colonial building and the stone wall, could be brightened to reveal more texture. The highlights in the sky are slightly blown out, reducing the overall depth of the image.

Composition:

The composition captures the different architectural styles effectively, with the colonial building and church spire serving as anchors in the frame. However, the modern high-rise on the right feels slightly disconnected from the main scene. A tighter crop or different angle could create a stronger connection between the historical and modern elements.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp, ensuring the details in the buildings are clear.
• The tonal range is limited, with blown highlights and lost shadow details.
• The street elements (e.g., cars, pedestrians) add context but also create some visual clutter.

Distractions:

The car and scooter in the foreground detract from the timeless quality of the architecture. The blown-out sky also draws attention away from the subject and diminishes the overall balance.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Moderate, with an interesting juxtaposition but limited emotional pull (+3 points deduction).
• Presentation: Clean but with tonal imbalances in shadows and highlights (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Needs better tonal control, particularly in the sky and shadows (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Effective, though slightly cluttered and unbalanced (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal but includes distracting elements such as vehicles (+2 points deduction).

Revised Score: 89 (Good - Above average image, but could be improved)

This photo effectively documents the theme of "past meets present," but improvements in tonal balance, composition, and reducing distractions could elevate it to the excellent category. The juxtaposition of architectural styles is compelling and worth further refinement.

GROUP A - SCORE 91.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 90 | Carlos Castaneda  93

1/2000 sec f/8 420 mm 640 ISO

Critique of the Photo ChatGPT:

Impact:

This image captures an extraordinary moment of an osprey about to land, showcasing the grace, strength, and precision of the bird. The pose with extended talons frozen in mid-air adds an incredible dynamic element. The monochrome treatment complements the subject well by focusing on texture, light, and shadow rather than color, amplifying the intensity of the scene.

Presentation:

The presentation is excellent. The osprey is sharply focused, and the contrast between its feather details and the clean, soft sky is striking. The nest and tree perch provide environmental context without overwhelming the subject. The overall balance between subject and background is well-maintained, but a slight increase in contrast around the bird could make it stand out even more.

Exposure:

The exposure is handled well, with no blown-out highlights or crushed shadows. The tonal range is strong, emphasizing the bird's texture and the structural details of the nest. However, the lighter tones on the bird's underbelly could be slightly enhanced to reveal more detail and add depth.

Composition:

The composition is well thought out, with the osprey positioned dynamically as it moves toward its perch. The inclusion of the nest at the bottom left and the empty space on the right creates a sense of motion and storytelling. The negative space in the sky emphasizes the bird's flight, though a slightly tighter crop could heighten the focus on the osprey.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp on the bird, especially on its eyes and talons, which are critical to the image's success.
• The background is clean and noise-free, ensuring no distractions.
• No significant technical flaws are evident, though slight tonal adjustments could further enhance the bird’s details.

Distractions:

There are no significant distractions in this image. The background is clean and uncluttered, allowing the viewer to focus entirely on the osprey and its surroundings.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Powerful and dynamic, evoking awe at the bird's precision (+1 point deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though slight tonal refinements could enhance the bird's detail (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Well-managed, with minor room for improvement in the highlights on the bird's underbelly (+1 point deduction).
• Composition: Strong, but a slightly tighter crop could enhance focus on the osprey (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with no major issues affecting quality (+0 points deduction).

Final Score: 95 (Excellent - A near-perfect image)

This is a spectacular wildlife image with a strong sense of motion and storytelling. With minor tonal adjustments and a tighter crop, it could achieve a perfect score. The precise moment captured and its execution make it a standout entry in any monochrome competition.

Original Score: 95
Revised Critique:

• Impact: The action shot is powerful, but a stronger sense of interaction with the environment (e.g., nest activity) could elevate the story.
• Exposure: The white feathers on the bird’s belly are slightly flat and could benefit from more detail.
• Composition: While strong, the empty space to the right could be reduced without affecting the sense of motion.

Revised Score: 92

GROUP B - SCORE 86

JUDGES: Richard Waas 84 | Carlos Castaneda  88

GROUP A - SCORE 82

JUDGES: Richard Waas 81 | Carlos Castaneda 83

 Critique of the Photo by ChatGPT

Impact:

The image conveys a serene yet dynamic feeling, capturing the small bird's movement across a beach. The monochrome theme is effectively applied, emphasizing textures and contrasts. However, the emotional pull could be stronger if there were a more striking element, such as dramatic lighting or a more engaging background.

Presentation:

The composition is clean, with minimal distractions. The black-and-white tones are well-executed, emphasizing the subject and the texture of the sand. The simplicity aligns well with the monochrome theme. A slight adjustment to contrast might enhance the visual impact further.

Exposure:

The exposure is balanced. The subject (the bird) is well-defined, and the highlights on the wet sand are not overly bright. However, the darker shadows near the bottom of the frame might obscure some details that could add more depth.

Composition:

The placement of the bird in the frame adheres to the rule of thirds, with the bird slightly off-center, which creates a sense of motion. However, the large negative space in the image could feel a bit overwhelming. Cropping some of the empty space on the right might improve the balance without compromising the mood.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp on the bird, which is critical for this image.
• There are no noticeable issues with noise or artifacts.
• The image lacks any clear technical flaws but could benefit from subtle sharpening or clarity adjustments to further bring out details in the feathers and the sand texture.

Distractions:

There are minimal distractions, which works well for this image's simplicity. The tiny scattered objects on the sand do not detract but rather add to the natural feel of the scene.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong but could be heightened with more dramatic contrast or mood (+3 points deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though slight adjustments to cropping or contrast could enhance the image (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Very good, minor improvements possible (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Good but could feel more dynamic with cropping (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal issues, no significant flaws.

Final Score: 88 (Excellent - A well-done image)

The image is strong and well-suited to the monochrome theme. With slight refinements, it could elevate to the superior category.

GROUP A - SCORE 74.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 81 | Carlos Castaneda  68

A close encounter at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo in Colorado Springs. Taken with the Samsung cell phone camera.

 Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

The giraffe's close-up creates an engaging and whimsical feel, with its curious expression drawing the viewer in. The choice of monochrome enhances the texture of the giraffe’s patterned skin and creates a sharp contrast with the background. While it’s a fun and approachable image, the overall impact could be heightened by a stronger composition or more dramatic lighting.

Presentation:

The subject is clearly the focal point, and the framing captures the giraffe's character. The inclusion of the wooden fencing and trees in the background adds context but slightly detracts from the simplicity of the subject. The monochrome treatment is effective in highlighting textures but could benefit from a more dynamic tonal range.

Exposure:

The exposure is well-balanced for the giraffe, with details in its skin and fur rendered effectively. However, the sky in the background is overly flat, lacking contrast or interest, which reduces the overall depth of the image.

Composition:

The composition is playful, with the giraffe filling the majority of the frame. However, the tight crop on the left side cuts off part of its ear, slightly disrupting the balance. Including the full ear or reframing to focus on a more dynamic angle would enhance the composition. The border around the image adds an extra layer of presentation but might not align with competition standards.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus on the giraffe is sharp, and details are well-preserved.
• The background feels overly plain and doesn't contribute significantly to the image’s story.
• The crop on the ear is slightly awkward, affecting the balance.

Distractions:

The wooden railing and the trees in the background compete for attention with the giraffe. Simplifying the background through angle adjustments or post-processing could help.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Engaging and whimsical but not deeply emotional or dramatic (+3 points deduction).
• Presentation: Good subject clarity but minor distractions in the background (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Well-handled on the subject but flat in the sky (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Playful but slightly imbalanced due to the cropped ear (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, aside from competing background elements (+1 point deduction).

Revised Score: 89 (Good - Above average image, but could be improved)

This image is fun and engaging, with a strong subject and character. Refining the composition and tonal range, as well as simplifying the background, could elevate it to a higher level. As it stands, it’s a charming entry with room for improvement.

GROUP A - SCORE 68

JUDGES: Richard Waas 73 | Carlos Castaneda  63

This was shot at the shopping center called Sunset Place in South Miami. This is the spiral staircase in this complex. I shot both from the top of the stairs looking down and from the bottom looking up. Sunset Place is a rather eerie place these days. There are very few stores that are occupied. This shopping center is scheduled for demolition and replacement by a new complex. I have visited here several times to shoot. I find many interesting things to shoot each time I visit. 

Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

The image of the spiral staircase is striking and immediately grabs attention with its mesmerizing repetition of curves and lines. The downward perspective creates a sense of depth and intrigue, inviting the viewer to explore the spiral visually. The monochrome treatment effectively enhances the textures and geometric patterns, amplifying the visual appeal.

Presentation:

The staircase is presented cleanly, with excellent attention to the symmetry and flow of the design. The monochrome processing emphasizes contrast, allowing the black railings and light-colored tiles to stand out sharply. However, the slightly overexposed areas near the top edge and the presence of a few distracting signs detract slightly from the polished presentation.

Exposure:

The exposure is generally well-handled, with a good range of tonal values that highlight the depth and texture of the staircase. However, the brighter sections near the top could benefit from slight adjustments to prevent the loss of detail.

Composition:

The composition is dynamic and well-balanced, with the spiral leading the viewer’s eye naturally toward the center of the image. The inclusion of the bottom of the staircase grounds the image and provides a clear endpoint. However, the presence of signage and minor clutter within the spiral detracts slightly from the otherwise clean aesthetic.

Technical Flaws:

• The image is sharp and detailed, with no visible noise.
• Some highlights near the top appear slightly overexposed.
• Minor distractions, such as the sign visible within the frame, disrupt the minimalist appeal.

Distractions:

The "4th Floor Parking" sign and the visible grate at the bottom of the staircase draw attention away from the otherwise mesmerizing patterns. These elements could be minimized or removed in post-processing to enhance the overall effect.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: High, with a visually engaging and striking composition (+0 points deduction).
• Presentation: Clean and polished but slightly affected by minor distractions (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Generally well-balanced, though highlights could use slight adjustments (+1 point deduction).
• Composition: Excellent use of symmetry and perspective, with minor elements disrupting minimalism (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal but worth noting (+1 point deduction).

Revised Score: 94 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This image is a strong and visually captivating entry. Addressing the minor distractions and highlights could elevate it to an even higher standard. Its symmetry, depth, and graphic appeal make it a standout in the competition.

GROUP A - SCORE 84.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 86 | Carlos Castaneda  83

Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

The image has a strong visual and emotional impact, drawing the viewer into the scene with its sense of depth and scale. The alignment of the towering trees and the pathway creates a natural leading line that guides the viewer’s eye toward the small, solitary figure in the distance, evoking feelings of solitude and wonder. The monochrome treatment effectively highlights the texture of the tree bark and the interplay of light and shadow.

Presentation:

The presentation is clean and purposeful, with the symmetry of the tree alignment creating a balanced composition. The monochrome processing brings out the fine details in the trees and fallen leaves, though the tonal range could be expanded slightly to deepen the shadows and add more contrast.

Exposure:

The exposure is generally well-handled, with good detail in the tree trunks and leaves. However, the mid-tones dominate, and the lack of stronger highlights or shadows makes the image feel slightly flat. Enhancing the contrast could give the image more depth and drama.

Composition:

The composition is excellent, with the path and trees forming a strong vanishing point that emphasizes depth. The solitary figure adds a focal point and sense of scale, while the empty bench on the right provides a subtle secondary element that adds context without distracting. The natural symmetry of the trees is well-utilized.

Technical Flaws:

• The image is sharp, with excellent detail in the textures of the bark and leaves.
• The tonal range could be improved to better separate the foreground from the background.
• There are no significant distractions, but the slight flatness of the tones reduces the overall impact.

Distractions:

There are no major distractions in the scene. The clean composition and minimal clutter keep the focus on the trees and pathway.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Strong emotional and visual impact, with a well-executed sense of depth (+0 points deduction).
• Presentation: Clean and balanced but with room for tonal improvement (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Good overall, though it could benefit from more dynamic range (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Excellent use of symmetry and leading lines (+0 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, but slightly flat tonal balance (+1 point deduction).

Revised Score: 96 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This image stands out for its strong composition and emotional resonance. Enhancing the contrast and tonal range slightly would elevate it further, but as it stands, it is a compelling and beautifully crafted photograph.

GROUP A - SCORE 78

JUDGES: Richard Waas 83 | Carlos Castaneda  73

Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

This image of the bridge is visually striking, showcasing the geometric design and structure in a clean and detailed manner. The monochrome treatment enhances the texture and lines of the cables and bridge pillars, emphasizing its architectural beauty. However, while technically strong, the emotional impact is limited as it focuses more on structure than storytelling.

Presentation:

The bridge is well-presented, with sharp details in the cables and the light reflecting beautifully off the structure. The simplicity of the background ensures the viewer’s focus remains on the bridge. The tonal contrast is excellent, highlighting the interplay of light and shadow on the bridge's design.

Exposure:

The exposure is balanced, with the highlights on the cables and pillars shining without being blown out. Shadows add depth and texture, while the darker background contrasts well with the bridge. There are no overexposed or underexposed areas, making the image technically impressive.

Composition:

The composition is strong, with the bridge framed centrally to emphasize its symmetry and lines. The diagonal positioning of the road adds dynamism, leading the viewer’s eye through the frame. However, cropping slightly tighter on the top and right side could improve the balance by eliminating excess negative space.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is excellent, with sharp details on the cables and structure.
• The tonal range is well-executed, emphasizing both texture and depth.
• There are no visible noise or distractions, making the image technically sound.

Distractions:

There are no significant distractions, as the clean background and sharp subject ensure a polished presentation. However, the small vehicles on the bridge are visible but not detailed enough to add meaningful scale or context, slightly detracting from the overall simplicity.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Strong architectural focus, but limited emotional engagement (+2 points deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though a slight crop could enhance balance (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Perfectly handled, with no tonal issues (+0 points deduction).
• Composition: Strong, but tighter framing could improve the focus on the bridge (+2 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with no major issues but minor elements like vehicles not adding to the composition (+1 point deduction).

Revised Score: 94 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This is a technically impeccable image that beautifully showcases the bridge’s structure. With slight compositional adjustments and a focus on creating more emotional engagement, it could elevate to the superior category.

GROUP B - SCORE 66

JUDGES: Richard Waas 79 | Carlos Castaneda  53

Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

The image captures an everyday scene at Chapultepec Castle, using the polished reflective floor to add visual interest. While the reflections and dynamic angles create intrigue, the emotional impact and storytelling feel limited due to the lack of a clear focal point or narrative. The inclusion of people adds context but doesn’t strongly engage the viewer.

Presentation:

The polished floor with its geometric pattern and reflection is the standout element of this photograph. However, the figures feel visually scattered, and the background structure (e.g., the building and BBVA tower) competes with the foreground for attention. The hazy light around the edges softens the scene, but it also reduces clarity.

Exposure:

The exposure is moderately well-managed, with the reflections and patterns in the floor clearly visible. However, the sky and background feel slightly overexposed, causing the distant elements to lack texture and detail. The bright haze diminishes the overall crispness of the scene.

Composition:

The low-angle perspective is a creative choice, but the composition feels overly busy. The people are spaced out in a way that detracts from the balance, and the reflections, while interesting, don’t lead to a clear subject. Cropping the left and right sides could focus the viewer more on the interplay between the people and their reflections.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is good on the floor, but some parts of the figures and the distant tower lack sharpness.
• The haze around the edges creates a distraction, diminishing the overall clarity.
• The tonal range could use better balance, particularly in the highlights, to add depth and detail.

Distractions:

The BBVA tower in the background, while adding context, distracts from the primary elements. The haze and scattered figures also create visual noise, reducing the impact of the reflections.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Limited emotional or storytelling connection, though the reflections are engaging (+3 points deduction).
• Presentation: Reflections are strong, but scattered elements reduce focus (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Highlights in the background are slightly overexposed (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Busy and lacks a clear focal point, though the low-angle perspective is creative (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: The haze and background elements detract from the image (+2 points deduction).

Revised Score: 88 (Good - Above average image, but could be improved)

This photo demonstrates creative vision with the low-angle perspective and reflections, but the lack of a clear focal point and overexposed elements hold it back from excellence. With tighter composition and improved tonal balance, it could be significantly enhanced.

 GROUP A - SCORE 81.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 87 | Carlos Castaneda  76

Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

This image has a unique and humorous concept, juxtaposing the casual demeanor of the seated individual with the formal portraits of political leaders behind him. The idea of "feeling presidential" comes through clearly and adds a playful, narrative quality. However, the emotional resonance might feel limited to viewers unfamiliar with the context.

Presentation:

The lighting on the subject is well-handled, highlighting his face and creating separation from the darker tones of the bench and background. The background mural is slightly weathered, which adds texture but also feels visually busy, competing with the subject for attention.

Exposure:

The exposure on the subject is balanced, ensuring details in his face, clothing, and shoes are well-preserved. However, the mural in the background has areas of overexposure, particularly near lighter regions, which detracts from the overall image.

Composition:

The composition is strong, with the subject positioned off-center and sitting at an angle that contrasts with the straight-on portraits behind him. The mural adds context and interest, but the foreground object in the lower left corner (likely part of a chair or other item) is distracting and could have been cropped out or avoided during capture.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp on the subject, capturing his expression and relaxed posture.
• The mural behind the subject is slightly overexposed in places, reducing clarity and detail.
• The lower-left object is a visual distraction and detracts from the overall polish of the image.

Distractions:

The mural, while adding context, competes with the subject and can feel overly busy. The lower-left corner object is an avoidable distraction that draws the viewer’s eye unnecessarily.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Unique and humorous but limited in broader emotional resonance (+2 points deduction).
• Presentation: Strong subject lighting but a busy background detracts slightly (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Balanced on the subject but overexposed areas in the mural reduce detail (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Creative placement but foreground distractions lower the overall effectiveness (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal sharpness issues, but avoidable distractions detract from polish (+2 points deduction).

Revised Score: 89 (Good - Above average image, but could be improved)

This is a creative and engaging photo with a humorous narrative, but the busy background and distractions limit its overall impact. With tighter cropping or adjustments to minimize distractions, it could elevate to the excellent category.

GROUP A - SCORE 88

JUDGES: Richard Waas 88 | Carlos Castaneda  88

ISO 1600; 60-600 @ 600 mm; f/9; 1/3200s
Natural Light
Camera mounted on a tripod

 Critique of the Photo by ChatGPT:

Impact:

The image is striking, capturing the eagle in flight with an imposing wingspan. The photograph evokes a sense of power and freedom, perfectly aligning with the monochrome theme. The sharp details in the feathers and the dramatic pose of the eagle make it compelling and impactful.

Presentation:

The bird is well-placed in the frame, with ample space to convey motion and freedom. The monochrome processing is well-done, but further adjustments to contrast might add depth, especially in the sky, which feels slightly flat.

Exposure:

The exposure on the eagle is excellent, with the tonal range highlighting details in the feathers and maintaining a good balance between light and shadow. The sky, while not distracting, could benefit from a slight darkening to add more drama and enhance the subject's presence.

Composition:

The composition is effective, with the eagle positioned dynamically. The symmetry and natural shape of the wings create a visually pleasing balance. The use of negative space adds to the sense of scale, although cropping some of the top might tighten the focus on the subject without losing the sense of openness.

Technical Flaws:

• The image is sharp and well-focused, with fine details in the bird's feathers.
• No noticeable noise or artifacts are present.
• The processing is clean, but additional fine-tuning to the sky could elevate the overall quality.

Distractions:

There are no significant distractions in the image. The clean, minimalistic sky keeps the focus entirely on the eagle. However, a slightly darker and textured sky might make the composition more dramatic.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong, evokes power and freedom, with potential for more drama (+2 points deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though slight improvements to contrast and cropping might enhance it further (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Great, with minor adjustments to the sky recommended (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Effective, with minor tweaks to balance possible (+1 point deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: None, processing is clean and effective.

Final Score: 94 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This image is captivating and well-suited to the competition theme. With subtle refinements to contrast and composition, it could achieve the "Superior" category.

 GROUP A - SCORE 79.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 82 | Carlos Castaneda 77

 Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

The photograph creates an immediate sense of nostalgia and elegance, with the antique oil lamp serving as the sole subject. The soft glow and play of light on the lamp’s surface evoke a timeless quality. The subtle tonal range and dark background emphasize the subject, but the overall emotional impact feels subdued due to the simplicity of the composition.

Presentation:

The lamp is well-presented, with the intricate details of the base and floral patterns on the glass visible and highlighted by the lighting. The dark background isolates the subject effectively, enhancing its prominence. However, the purple hue suggests this image may stray slightly from a true monochrome treatment, which could affect its adherence to the competition's theme.

Exposure:

The exposure is well-handled, with highlights on the lamp’s metallic and glass surfaces glowing softly. The shadows add depth, though some areas of the lamp base could use slight brightening to bring out finer details. The lighting is moody and controlled, fitting the subject matter.

Composition:

The composition is simple and balanced, with the lamp positioned centrally to focus the viewer's attention. The curved surface of the table adds a subtle grounding element. A slightly tighter crop could improve focus on the subject while eliminating unnecessary space.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp, capturing the details of the lamp and its textures.
• The tonal range is effective, but the apparent purple hue detracts from the competition’s monochrome requirement.
• There are no significant technical flaws, though the shadow on the right side of the image could be refined for better balance.

Distractions:

The only potential distraction is the slight purple tint, which feels inconsistent with a monochrome theme. The shadows on the right side also feel heavier than necessary, drawing attention away from the subject.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Strong sense of nostalgia but lacks a dynamic emotional or narrative pull (+2 points deduction).
• Presentation: Beautiful subject, though the purple hue detracts from the monochrome theme (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Well-managed, though the shadows on the base could be lifted slightly (+1 point deduction).
• Composition: Simple and balanced, but a tighter crop could improve focus (+1 point deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, though the tint and shadows affect consistency (+2 points deduction).

Revised Score: 92 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This image is beautifully crafted, showcasing the antique lamp with elegance and care. To better adhere to the monochrome theme, removing the purple tint and refining the shadows would elevate it further. The timeless quality of the subject makes it a strong entry, but it could be enhanced with minor adjustments.

GROUP A - SCORE 83

JUDGES: Richard Waas 88 | Carlos Castaneda  78

 Critique of the Photo Titled "Meditating on the Pier" Submitted to the Monochrome Competition

Impact:

The image evokes a strong sense of solitude and introspection, with the lone figure on the pier adding emotional depth. The dramatic sky and the monochrome treatment enhance the moodiness of the scene, making it visually striking and contemplative. This image effectively tells a story of quiet reflection, which resonates strongly with viewers.

Presentation:

The presentation is clean, with the pier serving as a leading line that draws the viewer's eye toward the subject. The contrast between the rough textures of the water and the smooth, reflective surface of the pier creates a pleasing dynamic. However, the noise in the sky slightly detracts from the polished feel of the overall image.

Exposure:

The exposure is balanced, with the highlights in the sky and pier well-managed. The darker areas of the water and pier retain detail, but the noise in the sky could benefit from some smoothing to enhance clarity without losing the moody atmosphere.

Composition:

The composition is strong, with the pier positioned centrally to create symmetry and guide the viewer’s gaze. The figure at the end of the pier provides a focal point that anchors the composition. The horizon line is well-placed, dividing the frame evenly between the dramatic sky and the water, adding balance.

Technical Flaws:

• The image is sharp in critical areas, particularly the pier and water.
• Noise is noticeable in the sky, which might be due to high ISO or post-processing adjustments.
• The tonal range is effective, but the noise slightly obscures the details in the clouds.

Distractions:

The primary distraction is the noise in the sky, which draws attention away from the clean lines of the pier and the lone figure. While the noise adds to the moodiness, reducing it slightly would improve the overall aesthetic.

Final Score:

Based on the scoring chart:

• Impact: Strong, with emotional resonance and storytelling elements (+1 point deduction).
• Presentation: Excellent, though noise reduction could improve clarity (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Well-handled, with minor refinements needed to the sky (+1 point deduction).
• Composition: Strong, with effective use of leading lines and balance (+0 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, with noise being the primary issue (+2 points deduction).

Final Score: 94 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This is a compelling and emotionally impactful photograph. With slight noise reduction in the sky, it could reach the superior category. The storytelling and mood are key strengths, making it a standout piece.

Original Score: 94
Revised Critique:

• Impact: The mood is strong, but the lone figure feels small and disconnected without additional context to deepen the emotional connection.
• Exposure: The noise in the sky detracts more than initially considered, softening the overall impact.
• Composition: While balanced, the image could benefit from a crop to reduce unnecessary negative space around the pier.

Revised Score: 91

GROUP B - SCORE 66.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 70 | Carlos Castaneda  63

 Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

The image captures a moment of movement and transition, with the figures walking toward an illuminated exit. The play of light and shadow within the tunnel adds visual interest, while the sense of depth created by the receding walls enhances the scene. However, the emotional or narrative impact feels subtle, lacking a clear story or focal point.

Presentation:

The strong geometric elements of the tunnel, combined with the interplay of light streaming through the space, create a dynamic setting. The figures act as a focal point, but their placement and body language feel somewhat detached, which limits their connection with the viewer. The bright exit provides context, but the overexposure in this area slightly diminishes detail.

Exposure:

The exposure is well-balanced within the tunnel, highlighting the texture of the walls and floor. However, the light at the exit is overexposed, blowing out the details of the background and making the transition between the tunnel and the outdoors feel abrupt. Adjusting this area could better preserve the sense of continuity.

Composition:

The composition benefits from the leading lines of the walls and floor, which guide the viewer’s eye toward the exit. The diagonal streaks of light on the walls add further dynamism. However, the inclusion of two figures without much interaction or narrative feels static. Cropping slightly closer to the figures or framing them more dynamically could enhance the story.

Technical Flaws:

• The image is sharp, particularly on the walls and textures.
• Overexposure at the exit disrupts the tonal balance and limits details in the background.
• The figures are slightly underwhelming as a focal point, given their lack of interaction or dynamic body language.

Distractions:

The bright exit acts as both a focal point and a distraction due to its overexposure. The tunnel itself is visually engaging, but the figures don’t fully utilize the potential of the scene.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Moderate, with a visually engaging setting but limited emotional or narrative resonance (+3 points deduction).
• Presentation: Dynamic lighting and textures, though the figures feel disconnected (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Good in the tunnel, but overexposure at the exit weakens the image (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Strong leading lines but a lack of engagement from the figures limits the storytelling (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, aside from the exit's overexposure (+1 point deduction).

Revised Score: 89 (Good - Above average image, but could be improved)

This photo has strong geometric and lighting elements that make it visually interesting, but the lack of a strong focal point or narrative holds it back. Refining the exposure and framing the figures more dynamically could elevate it to a higher level.

 GROUP B - SCORE 80.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 80 | Carlos Castaneda  79

Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

The image captures a bustling street scene in Old Cartagena, showcasing the vibrant architectural details and lively atmosphere. The dynamic nature of the scene, with pedestrians walking and shopkeepers engaging, gives a sense of cultural richness. However, the lack of a clear focal point reduces its emotional impact, making it more of a documentary-style image than one with a strong narrative.

Presentation:

The image is clean and detailed, with the architectural elements of the colonial buildings standing out. The monochrome treatment works well to highlight textures and contrasts, particularly in the intricate designs of the balconies and storefronts. However, the overall tonality feels slightly flat, and a stronger emphasis on shadows and highlights could add depth.

Exposure:

The exposure is generally balanced, with details preserved in both the shadows and highlights. However, the brighter areas of the sky and some building facades feel slightly overexposed, which detracts from the clarity and richness of the scene. Adjusting the highlights would improve the tonal range.

Composition:

The composition is good, with the street providing natural leading lines that guide the viewer’s eye deeper into the scene. The balance between the left and right sides is effective, but the scene feels visually busy, with no single subject to anchor the composition. Cropping or framing to emphasize a specific element or person could enhance focus.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus is sharp, capturing fine details in the buildings and street activity.
• The tonal range could use improvement, particularly in the brighter areas of the frame.
• The image contains no visible noise or artifacts, which enhances its overall quality.

Distractions:

The busy street scene, while engaging, has many competing elements, such as signage, people, and storefronts, which can overwhelm the viewer. The lack of a clear subject or focal point diminishes the storytelling potential of the image.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Moderate, with cultural richness but limited emotional resonance (+3 points deduction).
• Presentation: Clean and detailed, but tonal adjustments are needed (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Good, though some highlights are slightly overexposed (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Balanced but busy, lacking a strong focal point (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal flaws, but the visual busyness is a distraction (+1 point deduction).

Revised Score: 89 (Good - Above average image, but could be improved)

This photo effectively captures the vibrancy of Old Cartagena but would benefit from a clearer focal point, tonal adjustments, and stronger narrative elements to elevate it into the excellent category. It serves as a strong documentary image but lacks the emotional or artistic depth needed for higher scoring in competition.

GROUP A - SCORE 82.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 86 | Carlos Castaneda  79

Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

This image immediately captures attention with its striking symmetry and textural details. The radial pattern of the succulent creates a sense of balance and harmony, and the monochrome treatment enhances the interplay of light and shadow, emphasizing the form of the plant. The close-up perspective draws the viewer in, making the image visually engaging and impactful.

Presentation:

The subject is presented cleanly, with sharp focus on the center of the succulent and a pleasing depth of field that keeps the outer edges slightly softened. The monochrome processing is effective, though the highlights on some of the leaves feel slightly blown out, which reduces detail in those areas.

Exposure:

The exposure is well-handled in most of the frame, but the bright highlights on the edges of a few leaves detract slightly from the overall tonal balance. Subtler highlight adjustments could preserve more texture and improve the image's tonal range.

Composition:

The composition is excellent, with the succulent filling the frame and the spiral pattern naturally leading the viewer's eye toward the center. The radial symmetry is powerful and works well in monochrome, creating a balanced and harmonious image. There is no negative space to distract from the subject, making the composition feel intentional and focused.

Technical Flaws:

• Focus is sharp where it matters most, particularly in the center of the succulent.
• The tonal range is good overall, though highlights could be better controlled to preserve texture.
• There are no visible noise or artifacts, which adds to the polished feel of the image.

Distractions:

There are no significant distractions. The image is clean and minimalist, keeping the focus entirely on the succulent. However, the slight overexposure on some leaves can be considered a subtle distraction.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Strong visual appeal and balance, though the image doesn’t evoke deep emotional resonance (+2 points deduction).
• Presentation: Clean and polished, with minor highlight issues (+1 point deduction).
• Exposure: Good overall, but slight overexposure on highlights reduces texture in places (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Excellent, with no significant changes needed (+0 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, aside from the slight loss of detail in highlights (+1 point deduction).

Revised Score: 94 (Excellent - A well-done image)

This is a visually striking and well-composed image that showcases the beauty of natural patterns. With minor adjustments to the highlights, it could reach the superior category. The monochrome treatment works beautifully, emphasizing the symmetry and texture of the succulent.

GROUP A - SCORE 82.5

JUDGES: Richard Waas 86 | Carlos Castaneda  79

1/1000 sec f/10 ISO 6400 700 mm (100-500mm Canon RF lens with 1.4 extender

Critique of the Photo by GPT:

Impact:

This image captures a serene moment of a moose wading through a lake. The natural scene evokes calmness and a sense of solitude. However, the composition feels distant, and the lack of clear emotional engagement or dramatic light reduces the overall impact. The scene tells a quiet story but lacks a strong focal or dynamic element.

Presentation:

The texture of the water and the moose's fur are well-rendered, emphasizing the natural details. The monochrome treatment works well to highlight these textures, but the tonal contrast feels subdued, with the moose blending into the background rather than standing out prominently.

Exposure:

The exposure is balanced but leans towards flatness, especially in the mid-tones. The lack of strong highlights or deep shadows limits the depth of the image, which could benefit from more contrast to make the moose stand out against the water.

Composition:

The moose is well-placed within the frame, slightly off-center to allow for movement into the image, but the overall scene feels too wide. Cropping tighter around the moose and reducing the expanse of water would draw more attention to the subject. The inclusion of the grass and rock in the bottom-left corner adds context but feels disconnected due to their distance from the moose.

Technical Flaws:

• The focus on the moose is adequate but could be sharper to emphasize details like the texture of the fur.
• The tonal range lacks contrast, resulting in a less dynamic image.
• The background water texture, while interesting, competes too much with the moose for attention.

Distractions:

The wide expanse of water dominates the frame and detracts from the subject. Additionally, the moose's fur and the water’s texture are too similar in tone, causing the subject to blend in rather than stand out.

Final Score:

Based on the stricter scoring criteria:

• Impact: Moderate, with a peaceful scene but limited emotional or dramatic resonance (+3 points deduction).
• Presentation: Clean details but lacks tonal contrast to emphasize the subject (+2 points deduction).
• Exposure: Balanced but flat, needing more dynamic range (+2 points deduction).
• Composition: Too wide, with a lack of focus on the moose as the central element (+3 points deduction).
• Technical Flaws & Distractions: Minimal, but the moose blends too much into the background (+1 point deduction).

Revised Score: 89 (Good - Above average image, but could be improved)

This image captures a tranquil moment in nature but would benefit from stronger tonal contrast, sharper focus on the moose, and tighter cropping to reduce distractions and emphasize the subject. With these adjustments, it could elevate to the excellent category.

GROUP B - SCORE 79

JUDGES: Richard Waas 80 | Carlos Castaneda  79