The post Full Frame vs APS-C vs Micro Four Thirds: Camera Sensors Explained appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Kunal Malhotra.

What’s the difference between full-frame vs APS-C vs Micro Four Thirds sensors? And how do these sensor differences affect your photos?

Thinking about camera sensors can get pretty confusing. That’s why I break it all down for you in this article – and I offer plenty of examples to illustrate the camera sensor effects.

So if you want to know, once and for all, how sensor type impacts your images, then let’s get started.

What is a full-frame vs an APS-C (crop) vs a Micro Four Thirds (MFT) camera?

The sensor is the part of a camera that actually captures an image. It takes in light, which it then converts to image data.

Now, different camera types offer different-sized sensors, and that’s the fundamental difference between full-frame, APS-C, and Micro Four Thirds cameras.

A full-frame camera contains a sensor size equivalent to 35mm film (36 mm x 24 mm). This is the largest sensor size marketed to photography consumers.

An APS-C camera, on the other hand, has a smaller sensor. The specifics depend on the camera brand, but the sensor size is generally around 23 mm x 15 mm.

Finally, there are Micro Four Thirds cameras, which contain Micro Four Thirds sensors; these are even smaller than APS-C sensors, clocking in at just 17.3 mm x 13 mm.

Now, apart from the physical sizes, there are several important differences between full-frame, APS-C, and Micro Four Thirds sensors.

So let’s take a look at the factors affected by sensor size, starting with:

Crop factor

Say you mount a 50mm lens on a full-frame camera. When you press the shutter button, it captures a 50mm image.

Makes sense, right? A 50mm lens captures a 50mm image. Simple.

But what if you mount a 50mm lens on an APS-C camera? Will it capture a 50mm image?

The answer is no.

Since an APS-C sensor is smaller than the full-frame sensor, the sensor crops the frame, giving you a result that looks zoomed in – as if you took the photo with a 75mm lens rather than a 50mm lens.

(Confused? Don’t be. The effect is similar to taking a photo with a 50mm lens, then heading home and cropping the image on your computer. You’ll get a tighter shot, one that looks like it was taken with a longer lens.)

And that is what the term crop factor means. It refers to the different crop effects created by different sensor sizes. A full-frame camera is the standard; it has no crop factor. An APS-C sensor (also known as a crop sensor), has a crop factor of 1.5x (on Nikon and Sony cameras) or 1.6x (on Canon cameras). The Micro Four Thirds crop factor is even stronger: 2x.

As I explained above, the crop factor affects your field of view. Look at the series of images below:

The image on the left was taken with a full-frame camera. But apply the APS-C crop factor, and you get a tighter shot (the center image). Use a Micro Four Thirds camera, and you’ll get an even tighter result (the right image).

Focal length

A crop factor has a predictable affect on your lens’s focal length.

You see, the focal length measurement of any given lens is based on the standard 35mm film format. And since an APS-C camera (and a Micro Four Thirds camera) crop out the edges of the frame, you end up with an “effective” focal length that corresponds directly to the original focal length multiplied by the crop factor.

For example, a crop-sensor camera such as the Nikon D5600 has a crop factor of 1.5x. Thus, if I mount a 35mm lens on my Nikon D5600, it would multiply the focal length by 1.5x, effectively giving me a focal length output of around 52.5mm.

(But if you mount the same lens on a full-frame Nikon body such as the D850, it gives an output of 35mm.)

Similarly, if you mount a 35mm lens on a Micro Four Thirds camera – which has a crop factor of 2x – it effectively doubles the focal length to around 70mm.

Depth of field

As with focal length, a multiplier effect gets applied to the aperture when using APS-C and MFT cameras.

The aperture or f-stop is one of several factors determining the depth of field. Thus, a Micro Four Thirds camera gives us more depth of field when compared to a full-frame camera, assuming both cameras are using equivalent effective focal lengths. Same with an APS-C camera compared to a full-frame camera; you get more depth of field using the APS-C camera, assuming the effective focal length on both cameras is identical.

For example, an image shot at f/1.8 on a Micro Four Thirds camera gives an output similar to an image shot at f/3.6 on a full-frame camera and f/2.7 on a crop-sensor camera. This is assuming that the effective focal length and other shooting conditions stay the same.

Camera size

Full-frame sensors are larger than APS-C and Micro Four Thirds sensors.

So as you can probably guess, full-frame cameras tend to be far bigger and heavier than their APS-C and MFT counterparts.

For some photographers, this won’t matter much; if you shoot in the studio every day, a smaller Micro Four Thirds camera won’t offer much of an advantage.

But if you’re a travel photographer who needs to keep your gear as lightweight and compact as possible, a Micro Four Thirds body is a fantastic option.

Plus, APS-C and MFT cameras are more convenient. You can hang them on your neck or keep them in a backpack all day without feeling like you’re carrying a brick.

Low-light performance

Generally, full-frame cameras feature superior low-light and high-ISO performance. This results in much better image quality than crop-sensor (or Micro Four Thirds) cameras can achieve.

But why do full-frame cameras perform better in low light?

Full-frame cameras have larger sensors and are therefore capable of capturing more light than their smaller-sensor counterparts, which minimizes unwanted noise.

For instance, Micro Four Thirds cameras don’t perform well under low-light conditions where the ISO needs to be cranked up to, say, above 1600.

(Note that full-frame cameras also offer superior dynamic range, which allows you to capture more detail in a single shot.)

For these reasons, while full-frame cameras can be expensive, bulky, and annoying to carry around, they are still the industry standard and the preferred cameras for nearly all professional photography work.

Full frame vs APS-C vs Micro Four Thirds: conclusion

Now that you’ve finished this article, you should hopefully have a grasp on the differences between these sensor types – and why you might want to choose one sensor over another.

Just remember:

All three sensors – full frame, APS-C, and MFT – are very capable of capturing stunning photos.

So don’t worry too much about the differences.

Now over to you:

Do you have a favorite sensor type? Which of these three sensors does your camera use? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

The post Full Frame vs APS-C vs Micro Four Thirds: Camera Sensors Explained appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Kunal Malhotra.